You are here: HOME > > The Strong Process Organization
As business leaders in the Wal-Mart economy, we have to grasp an important distinction - the difference between what I call strong-process organizations (SPOs) and weak-process organizations (WPOs). Over the years I have observed that most organizations fall into one of these two camps. On the surface, the executives at both often believe they are SPOs. They profess to having well-defined processes and the latest hardware and software to make them run at world-class speed. Only the real SPOs, however, deliver world-class results--because they run with the repetitive behaviors, good training, consistent reinforcement, and accountability that sustain success.
Strong-process organizations have strong process discipline to ensure that their processes are adhered to throughout the organization. Changes to the processes are disseminated through the process design itself. Because the organization supports employees so well, average people can achieve above-average results.
By contrast, most companies are weak-process organizations. Their executives fail to realize superior results because managers launch ad hoc processes, usually related to "the way we've always done it." Employees have little discipline in following the official processes anyway, and managers regularly call "audibles" to patch up snafus. Perhaps most telling, WPOs require talented "stars" planted around the organization in key positions to muscle results over the goal line.
Well-defined processes, supported by technology, are central--without them, your company is, by definition, a WPO. What really sets Wal-Mart and other strong-process organizations apart are the choices their executives make when it comes to four key managerial factors: exerting the proper leadership, implementing clear governance practices, applying the right discipline, and championing the right attitudes. Only then do they create the environment for performance that typifies the strong-process organization.
The Leadership Difference |
|
Strong-Process Organization |
Weak-Process Organization |
Leaders are embedded throughout the business |
Leaders are distant from the front lines |
Leaders work themselves out of a job |
Leaders entrench themselves for job security |
Promotions are results-based |
Promotions are tenure-based |
Communications are frequent and comprehensive |
Communications are sporadic and disconnected |
The Governance Difference |
|
Strong-Process Organization |
Weak-Process Organization |
Goals are clearly defined and stable |
Goals are vaguely defined and/or constantly shifting |
Guardrails guide local and global decision-making |
Parameters and responsibility for decision-making are unclear |
Processes are embedded in company |
Processes are embedded in people |
There is a process for changing processes |
Gatekeepers protect the status quo and control critical resources |
The Discipline Difference |
|
Strong-Process Organization |
Weak-Process Organization |
Performance measures are focused and consistent |
Performance measures are scattered and inconsistent |
Results are valued |
Effort is valued |
There is a bias for information and knowledge |
Company drowns in data without useful information |
Accountability is high; consequences (positive and negative) are imposed |
Accountability is low; consequences are meted out erratically |
The Attitude Difference |
|
Strong-Process Organization |
Weak-Process Organization |
Bias is for action |
Meetings are acceptable substitutes for action |
Employees toe the line on processes and procedures |
Managers frequently call audibles |
The right people are in the right seats on the bus |
Company retains and rewards "But People" |
Complexity is absorbed upstream to make processes close to the customer simple |
Complexity is pushed downstream toward the customer |
The Performance Difference |
|
Strong-Process Organization |
Weak-Process Organization |
Average people achieve above-average results |
Stars are required around the organization to muscle results |
Leaders successfully transfer across functions |
Leaders cannot successfully transfer across functions |
Processes scale up and down well |
Processes do not scale up and down well |
Leaders are "dispensable" |
Leaders cannot leave without significant impact on the company |
SPO leaders may not be successful in WPO companies |
Stars can be successful in other WPOs |
Marble Leadership Partners, Inc.
200 South Wacker Drive
31st Floor
Chicago, IL 60606
847.242.9525 phone
847.242.9432 fax
Site design by:
Jacksonville web design
for small business.
Wal-Smart and Walsmart are in no way authorized by, endorsed by, a trademark of,
or affiliated with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. or its subsidaries or its affiliates.